WebsiteBaker Community Forum

WebsiteBaker Support (2.13.x) => General Help & Support => Topic started by: richwingerter on October 11, 2021, 09:11:05 PM

Title: Seeking recommendation for WB version
Post by: richwingerter on October 11, 2021, 09:11:05 PM

I'm currently using WebsiteBaker 2.12.2. Should I stick with this version or upgrade to something newer, like a 2.13.x? What do we expect will be the release date for the next stable version?

Thanks for your advice!

Title: Re: Seeking recommendation for WB version
Post by: crnogorac081 on October 11, 2021, 09:18:40 PM

2.13 r60 is latest stabile version and you should update to this version. However, your current version may work for years , but how long it depends on your hosting company and their plans when to upgrade their servers.

Title: Re: Seeking recommendation for WB version
Post by: hgs on October 12, 2021, 10:01:29 AM

A correction to the post   ;)

The Current version is the 2.13.0 rev. 63 and here is always the correct download.
https://wiki.WebsiteBaker.org/doku.php/en/downloads (https://wiki.WebsiteBaker.org/doku.php/en/downloads)
On the version 2.13.1 is already worked diligently again.

Title: Re: Seeking recommendation for WB version
Post by: richwingerter on November 14, 2021, 01:00:05 AM

Thanks for your advice!

Title: Re: Seeking recommendation for WB version
Post by: richwingerter on November 14, 2021, 02:09:43 AM

I'm installing this on a Linux system. There used to be a .tar.gz I could use to install. Is there one for 2.13.0 r63? If not, how would you recommend I install this on Linux? Also, is there any documentation on how to upgrade from, say, 2.12?

Thanks!

Title: Re: Seeking recommendation for WB version
Post by: dbs on November 14, 2021, 09:51:18 AM

Hi, apparently you need to create your own tar.gz from the zip file.
The upgrade instructions are the same as for 2.12.2.

Title: Re: Seeking recommendation for WB version
Post by: richwingerter on November 15, 2021, 04:36:35 AM

Thank you. I think that's what I did before. I looked at the install/upgrade page for 2.12.2. I think I interpreted that to mean to unzip the file on a windows system and then use tar (in a shell) to create the .tar.gz file. So, that's my plan.