WebsiteBaker Community Forum

General Community => WebsiteBaker Website Showcase => Topic started by: Tez Oner on July 02, 2012, 11:03:19 PM

Title: 2 new websites on WB!
Post by: Tez Oner on July 02, 2012, 11:03:19 PM
Hey,

launched 2 websites I designed and developed on WebsiteBaker!

- www.T-WoW.com (http://www.T-WoW.com) (on VA Template Framework 3.5.5) and
- www.MiaAndresen.nl (http://www.MiaAndresen.nl) (on VA Demosite Template 2.1).

Cheerz,

Tez Oner

Title: Re: 2 new websites on WB!
Post by: ctec on July 05, 2012, 09:02:34 AM
When checking your sites on the markup validity, it show that there are a lot of errors and warnings. Normally WB is in the clear on the markup validity. Did  you do a lot to change the code?
Title: Re: 2 new websites on WB!
Post by: Tez Oner on July 05, 2012, 08:05:31 PM
Hey ctec,

didn't change much on WB itself... but the sites I build are mainly developed on
the VA Template Framework, at moment version 3.5.5 which is still 'in development',
but very advanched and not a 'regular template'... lot's of page elements are parsed
from browser dependent files (IE, IE8, New browsers etc) so I will look good in most
browsers. (As my background is multimedia design/developement and not only coding ;)
I want to rapid develop cool and good looking sites...)

Most errors are - as I see it - are not crucial ones... as W3C sees for example a simple comment
like <!-- ================= /> as 'error' and most of jQuery give 'errors' to...
tho they are 'accepted widely'. Besided that there is a lot of HTML5 and CSS3... not
checked properly by W3C but accepted by most 'new/good' browsers like Safari, Chrome,
Opera, Firefox and Explorer.

And as long it doesn't give 'frontend errors' in new browsers it's oke as how I see it...
Most for example 'undefined functions' are because of old and unsupported browsers.
some next step in the VA Template Framework is trying to reduce the W3C errors...
as long it doesn't block to 'write clean' code and commenting etc... ;)

Cheerz,

Tez Oner



Title: Re: 2 new websites on WB!
Post by: Tez Oner on July 05, 2012, 08:44:05 PM
Update:

did some check and lastest release, not 'public' yet (didn't check it for a while...)
only showing 21 errors and 3 warnings on W3C, very acceptable ;)

Cheerz,

Tez Oner