General Community > WebsiteBaker Website Showcase

WebsiteBaker in Studentsorganisation Site

<< < (2/3) > >>

a2aseppa:
I am currently using Jetbox, which is also quite good though one has to know some php for the menu editing. That's why I consider trying WS Baker instead.

Have anyone of you guys tried Jetbox and WS Baker? Can you say which one beats another.

Overall I think CMS must have good usability for the clients.

fienieg:
WebsiteBaker, is very simple to use, it has nice colored admin section, with picture that speak for them self's. It just plain simple. And the advanced option from WebsiteBaker are great.  

It's just a great CMS

Stefan:
I have just now checked out the jetbox demo at opensourcecms, but I don't think these two are really in the same category. Jetbox seems to be one of the many portal CMS, whereas WB is intended to be usable by everybody who can use a computer. Just try it out and you'll see that there is a huge difference. While Mambo, Typo3, Jetbox and (almost) all the others are intended for constantly changing blog-style type websites (community, news pages), WB is meant primarily for a quasi-static web page. It also has a news module but the "standard" page is an html page with fixed links that you can actually BOOKMARK.

PS: I do have to say, the backend of jetbox is very shiny.

fienieg:
I must agree with stefan. Jetbox is a great CMS, if you know what you're doing. And have some extended knowlegde of cms systems. WB is for the general public. Just a stefan pointed out.

SilverFeces:
WB needs more of the community features, mainly forums and other things that can provide interaction with the browser.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page