WebsiteBaker Support (2.8.x) > Diskussion über WB (closed)
Tests & Probleme der SVN Revision 1374 - 2.8.2 RC
DarkViper:
I guess, it's the time now, to say a few words about the Media-Management by WB (WBMM).
I read the online help for WBMM. I found that there are described a couple of misunderstandings and never existing functionality.
It's not our goal to make the WBMM compatible to the online-help.. But it is necessary to make the online-help compatible to to the real existing WBMM!
WB - Media-Management never is...
* ... a new kind of One-Click-Hosting
* ... a new kind of 'YouTube' or 'Flicker'
* ... any kind of personal storage 'Cloud'
* ... any kind of download service
What WB - Media-Management really is:
WBMM is an easy possibility for authors to store their mediafiles, which are needed for build the content, on the webspace.
Nothing more nothing less.
The design with 'home-folders' is been made to give more overview about all the stored files, if more then one authors are working on the site.
All files must be accessible by http-requests to everybody, otherwise they can not properly included (as i.e. images) in wysiwyg-sections.
That's all what the WBMM wants and also does.
If somebody needs an extensible functionality...
Where is the Problem?? Don't hesitate to write your own module, providing exactly this functions you need.
WebsiteBaker per definition is a modular system which can be expanded for a lot of posibilities.
It makes absolutely no sense inflating some built-in functions in a endless way.
Why a user a outsized module must load... if he only wants to manage a handful files?
The general direction of WebsiteBaker is:
* Make the code as secure as possible!
* Do it easy as possible!
* Do it as fast as possible!
* Never do load or execute a line of code which is not needed for the current job!
Remember:
WebsiteBaker is a pure ContentManagemantSystem. It is never a Community-System, never any kind of Social-Networking-System or something else.
-------
We do NOT recoding modules right now. At the moment we're fixing security issues and the strongest bugs only.
DarkViper:
--- Quote from: hal 9000 on June 25, 2010, 02:35:29 PM ---My object of posting in this thread (and sending some PMs) was to get the security flaws (directory traversals) in the media center fixed - nothing else (basically SVN 1428 plus missing delete fix).
--- End quote ---
... a real security issue, it is under work
--- Quote from: hal 9000 on June 25, 2010, 02:35:29 PM ---Luisehahne was the person who announced that he would like to tackle the "home folder" thingy in 2.8.2. So for me it is just a matter of "missing" communication. Just make clear what you guys are willing to tackle in 2.8.2 and what not (as you tried in your last post).
--- End quote ---
,,, the actual behavior of 'homefolders' is buggy and will be corrected in the kind as described in my previous post above.
so a user (maybe better called 'author') has read permissions to any common files (which are uploaded by an 'admin') and full permissions to his own files in 'private area'(aka 'homefolder') but not in 'private area' of other authors.
mr-fan:
--- Quote ---,,, the actual behavior of 'homefolders' is buggy and will be corrected in the kind as described in my previous post above.
so a user (maybe better called 'author') has read permissions to any common files (which are uploaded by an 'admin') and full permissions to his own files in 'private area'(aka 'homefolder') but not in 'private area' of other authors.
--- End quote ---
would be real great if this would be possible! There is no real need for more features here..!
sorry but my work (summer, farm, harvest... you know) keep to much time to test "pre" RC SVN's....sorry
best regards
Martin
Luisehahne:
Sorry, es sträuben sich mir die Nackenhaare, vielleicht können wir hier weiter deutsch schreiben. Wie wärs es denn noch mit Niederländisch oder Französisch. Oder alles in den Enlischen Bereich verlagern. Musste jetzt mal gesagt werden. Wenn ich im Englischen Bereich mal ausversehen deutsch schreibe, bekomme ich auch einen drauf.
Ausserdem versteht auch HAL9000 deutsch, wie ich feststellen konnte.
Wenn das hier so weiter geht, schmeiss ich die Homefoldergeschicht e wieder um und nicht wie es in der Hilfe beschrieben ist.
Kannst sowieso nicht mehr viel ändern. Sonst müsste die Rechteverwaltung geändert werden. Und da werde ich wegen der Module eh nicht drangehen.
Den Moduleauthoren hate ich ja bereits das Angebot gemacht, uns bei Fragen oder Probleme anzusprechen.
Dietmar
Waldschwein:
Hallo!
Ruhig Blut - ich habe mir gerade einmal die WB 2.6.7 (!) installiert, die ja die Basis der Hilfe ist.
Dort wird die Homefolder so gehandhabt:
1.) Der Admin darf alles sehen.
2.) Ein "normaler" Benutzer sieht alles, außer Homefolder anderer Benutzer.
3.) Die Startseite ist immer (!) /media.
4.) Den FCKEditor - dort im Filebrowser wird das anders gehandhabt - gab es dort nicht. Der Filebrowser des damaligen Standard-Editors hat aber genau dieselbe Eigenheit - /media ist immer der Start, und nur Homefolder anderer Benutzer werden ausgeblendet.
Fazit: Ich würde es wünschen, wenn diese Logik wieder zurückkehrt. Um den FCK-Filebrowser kann ich mich kümmern. Also einen "Persönlichen Ordner" für jeden Benutzer - großartige Sicherheit muss es ja deswegen nicht geben.
Diese Logik von WB 2.6.7 finde ich nachvollziehbar, wenn sie überall - auch in den Filebrowsern der Editoren - ebenfalls so gehandhabt wird versteht jeder die Logik dahinter. Dass man nicht unbedingt seine Outlook .pst Datei dort hineinstellen sollte muss jedem sowieso so klar wie Kloßbrüh sein.
Gruß Michael
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version