General Community > Off-Topic

FontJazz

<< < (2/3) > >>

Stefek:

--- Quote from: kweitzel on January 17, 2010, 01:29:16 AM ---... but I always like the idea to "outsource" processing to client side
--- End quote ---
I see, but the PCDTR needs no JS enabled to run clientside.
That's an advantage.


--- Quote from: kweitzel on January 17, 2010, 01:29:16 AM ---... And from what I've seen until now it seems a better option than plain image replacing especially since the script "transforms" the existing H1 tag instead of replacing it with an image.
--- End quote ---
The Transformation is given anyway. The H1 (and all Replacements) Tag will be replaced anyway - not on the fly, but also using CSS as a operating base.
The "on the Fly" replacement of PCDTR is only given at the first run. After the image is created, it will be saved to a folder and (lightweight png's) the next time they are called from the cache.
Another Advantage is, that you can use different fonts by just using the CSS File - as you would normally do for other CSS - just ensure you have the Font in the directory (use AFE i.e.) and go.


--- Quote from: Hans on January 17, 2010, 10:42:51 AM ---I don't know about the license thing, but it would be nice if someone could make a frontend filter out of it.

--- End quote ---
The license doesn't inspire me to create such a filter...
I prefer to use the PCDTR Filter instead.
It's easy to set up and run.

Kind Regars,
Stefek 

Hans:
Hi Stefek
thanks for the reply. I think both have their pros and cons. As I prefer not to change the core (as is necessary to use the frontend filter) and because I'm not sure if the core replacement files are compatible with 2.8 (AMASP says it's for 2.7) I'll stick to FontJazz for the moment.
Thanks again
regards
Hans

Stefek:

--- Quote from: Hans on January 17, 2010, 12:02:42 PM ---Hi Stefek
thanks for the reply. I think both have their pros and cons. As I prefer not to change the core (as is necessary to use the frontend filter) and because I'm not sure if the core replacement files are compatible with 2.8 (AMASP says it's for 2.7) I'll stick to FontJazz for the moment.
Thanks again
regards
Hans

--- End quote ---

--- Quote ---As I prefer not to change the core (as is necessary to use the frontend filter)
--- End quote ---
This are only two files and those changes doesn't harm your WB installation in any way.

There should be a newer Version for 2.8 on developers site.

I am using the output filter on many pages. And with lots of filters.
One exemple is here:
http://mausefalle-kiel.de/ (Website still in Work)

Regards,
Stefek

pcwacht:
We are using CUFON on some sites -> http://wiki.github.com/sorccu/cufon/
See www.corderius.nl for example, watch the H1 tags

Is easy enough to implement, though it changes to images.


John

Hans:
@Stefek:
YES! Works great! Thank you.
@pcwacht:
Thanks for the tip, gonna try that too.
One question though: I wonder what the impact is on SEO. AFAIK FontJazz leaves the H1 tag for the search-engines intact (they say so in the FAQ) What about both mentioned alternatives from Stefek and pcwacht?
Thank you both!
Hans

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page