General Community > Off-Topic
The Pacer EditionCMS
Argos:
Too bad, this could be the beginning of the end. Instead of working together on the same project, after Ryans departure, people decide to create forks. I don't even see any real differences, there is some untrue info, and and there's lots of information missing. I don't like this a bit. Of course anyone is free to create a fork, but it will weaken the project as a whole.
Luisehahne:
I mean, "There can be only an one"
Dietmar
Hans:
For me, it's not a thread, it's an challenge to bring out WB 2.8 as soon as possible. After all there's not much new in the fork, most features we have already in the form of modules. And there's no forum like this, with so many helping people.
But I aggree that's a pitty that some people that have contributed so much to WB leave and start their own CMS. It's time to investigate why this could happen, what could be the reason and what we could do to prevent things like this in the future.
Hans
Edit: made some changes because my English is not wat it should be (hope there are no more spelling issues, but I doubt, hope I'm understandable though)
Luckyluke:
Hi,
I regret that there is a fork of WB.
If the coders of WB and WB Pacer puts there heads together for a good dialogue, it can result in a very good version of WB 2.9 or 3.0.
Most of the people will stay with the original WB! But some go for the fork choice. And in the long run we will all choose the strongest product. Whether this is the 'original' WB or the Pacer Edition, the future will tell.
Grtz,
Luc
kweitzel:
@all ... this fork exists because there are too many people involved who are unwilling to compromise ... the dialog was quite exhaustive last year.
cheers
Klaus
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version